Abstract
This study investigated the
consistency of Henry David Thoreau’s social philosophy in relation to Antebellum
reform. Some critics have argued that Thoreau was influenced by radical
Abolitionism to such an extent that it led him to defend John Brown’s raid
on Harper’s Ferry Virginia in 1859 on the eve of the American Civil War.
Many believe "A Plea for Captain John Brown" is an indication of just how
far Thoreau departed from his earlier views on reform, especially those
expressed in his essay on "Resistance to Civil Government."
A close examination of Thoreau’s
writings reveals that he was not, however, a pacifist as is commonly assumed.
"A Plea," which uses the phrase, "resistance to tyranny," is remarkably
consistent with the epistemology and moral sentiment of Thoreau’s earlier
views on reform including "Resistance to Civil Government." Thoreau’s reform
essays are structured on the basis of Transcendentalist principles and
do not necessarily represent a radical break with tradition. Kantian idealism,
French Eclecticism, and Unitarian ethics are underlying aspects of Thoreau’s
Transcendental ethos. An understanding of these and their subsequent influence
on New England Transcendentalism helps to elucidate some of the apparent
contradictions in Thoreau’s political essays. Apart from various influences
and qualifiers, Thoreau’s reform essays are remarkable consistent contextually
as well.
Acknowledgment:
Special thanks to Thomas Blanding for referring
me to the works of C.G. Jung.
Dedication:
To Stacia Frederick
Michael J. Frederick is the Executive
Director of the Thoreau Society.
Thoreau Reader: Home - Civil
Disobedience